Unconvinced by socrates refutation of thrasymachus, glaucon renews thrasymachus argument that the life of the unjust person is better than that of the just person. Here, we go through a brief summary, and my argument on platos the republic, book i. Aune seems to be saying that socrates refutes thrasymachus by building up, or constructing, an alternate model of what justice can mean more than by showing the inconsistencies in thrasymachus argument. Differences between socrates and thrasymachuss views on justice philosophy essay. Conflicting perspectives in platos republic i and ii. Rachel barney, socrates refutation of thrasymachus. Socrates refutation of thrasymachus the blackwell guide to. The position thrasymachus takes on the definition of justice, as well as its importance in society, is one far differing from the opinions of the other interlocutors in the first book of platos republic. Harrison looks into certain peculiarities in the argument between thrasymachos and socrates and explores motives that may have led plato to have thrasymachos develop his doctrine in this particular fashion. Socrates failure in producing a counter argument to thrasymachus claim that justice is the advantage of the stronger, socrates bases his argument enourmously on sentimentality and prejudice. Socrates refutation of thrasymachus in book one of platos.
In this story, plato uses the caricature of socrates to discuss his own ideas, so while socrates is speaking in the book, it is platos writings and ideas, hence platos refutation of. Instead of interpreting him in a way that will make his assertions truthful and apt, socrates explicitly prefers to attribute to thrasymachus an inferior view that will make him open to attack. This core concept video focuses on platos republic, book 1, and discusses the sophist thrasymachus definition of justice as the advantage of the stronger gregory b. Thrasymachus eludes this first attempt at refutation by asserting that, strictly speaking, rulers are not rulers unless they are correct about the. Socrates is stopped by a servant and told to wait for polemarchus. Socrates thrasymachus glaucon but you have, socrates, said glaucon. This admission followed directly by a problematic argument for the claim that justice is associated with cleverness, wisdom, and virtue. Socrates failure in refuting thrasymachus essay 1008 words.
The refutation of callicles in platos gorgias volume 31 issue 2 george klosko. If a ruler is wrong, do we 1 do what is the advantage of the ruler or 2 do what the ruler thinks is the advantage of the ruler t argues that rulers cant bee wrong 2. Whats the argument of socrates in addressing thrasymachus. In conclusion, socrates contradiction to thrasymachus may be convincing for platos greek audience. Socrates refutation of thrasymachus the blackwell guide. Most scholars agree that socrates arguments in the course of his refutation of thrasymachus in platos republic are at best weak and at worse fallacious. Socrates failing in refuting thrasymachus check out our article example upon socrates failing in refuting thrasymachus to start writing. A very thoughtprovoking work about the meaning of justice.
Pdf socrates refutation of thrasymachus rachel barney. Thrasymachus definition of justice seems to imply that when the stronger rules in his own interests, then he is being unjust. Why do you ask such a question, i said, when you ought rather to be answering. Socrates wants to arguereason about letting him go on his way, but polemarchus says what if we dont listen. Thrasymachus on justice thrasymachus and the ruler in the strict sense socrates refutation of. Embracing his role as a sophist in athenian society, thrasymachus sets out to aggressively dispute socrates opinion that justice is a. Socrates refutation of thrasymachus in ha jang of socrates interlocutors in book one of platos republic, thrasymachus is the only one who openly questions the goodness of justice for the one who practises it. When we had got to this point in the argument, and every one saw that the definition of justice had been completely upset, thrasymachus, instead of replying to me, said. Socrates refutation of thrasymachus and treatment of virtue. Download file to see previous pages he argues with socrates who seems to disagree with this notion. Revised october 11, 2002 this web page was originally prepared for use in an introduction to philosophy course that spent up to five weeks on platos republic.
A summary of the argument between socrates and thrasymachus in book i of the republic. The refutation of callicles in platos gorgias greece. We know that thrasymachus was born in chalcedon, a colony of megara in bithynia, and that he had distinguished. Socrates becomes concerned that thrasymachus is making a more. In producing a counter argument to thrasymachus claim that justice is the advantage of the stronger, socrates bases his argument enourmously on sentimentality and prejudice. He assumes that the virtues which are supposedly functioning in the realm of ideas can also work propably in the world. The rest of the dialogue is occasioned by glaucons dissatisfaction with socrates refutation. Callicles and thrasymachus stanford encyclopedia of.
In book i of the republic, socrates refutes three accounts of justice those of. Sagp edward warren pac 8 san diego state university the argument in republic book one involves socrates and three successive speakers, cephalus, polemarchus, and thrasymachus. Socrates has to give arguments in support of his opinion, which he voices upon hearing thrasymachus tirade, that injustice is not more profitable than justice. Your trick is to take hold of the argument at the point where you can do it the most harm. The immoralist position the text of the republic begins with socrates interrogating cephalus and his son polemachus about the nature of justice. As part of his case, glaucon states what he claims most people consider the nature of justice to be and what its origins are. Socrates and glaucon are invited to polemarchus house by polemarchus and adeimantus. The arguments of republic bk i university of oxford. Although both see themselves as realists and reject the traditional basis for the good life, their individual views on the question of justice are in many ways on opposite ends. Justice and injustice in thrasymachus account abstract. Socrates refutation of thrasymachus and treatment of virtue jstor.
Thrasymachus on justice thrasymachus and the ruler in the strict sense socrates refutation of thrasymachus conclusions. Thrasymachus has claimed both that 1 to do what the rulers prescribe is just, and 2 to do what is to the rulers advantage is just. The only refutation of thrasymachus position that justice is the interest. Therefore, socrates refutation of thrasymachus claim that justice is advantage of the stronger is nothing but a dictation of socrates attempt to reconcile his own ideology of a utopic republic with the status quo in ancient greece. Yes, he replied, and then socrates will do as he always does refuse to answer himself, but take and pull to pieces the answer of some one else. Republic as its reference horizon, this paper intends, while briefly presenting the positions on justice, as held by socrates and thrasymachus, to. Plato disapprovingly claimed thrasymachus could emotionally manipulate large crowds and aristotle credited him. It may also be of use to students who are reading parts of the republic in other contexts. At the same time several of his arguments are more powerful than they initially appear.
They join thrasymachus and polemarchus father, cephalus. Although both thrasymachus, and socrates rejected the traditional basis for the good life, and both also considered themselves as realists, their individual definitions of justice are very far apart from one. Socrates begins his refutation of thrasymachuss position by eliciting thrasymachuss sincere conviction that the unjust person always tries to outdo pleonektein get the better of everyone in every situation. Socrates and thrasymachus both reject traditional moral values on the grounds of what they see as reality. He objects to the manner in which the argument is proceeding. Plato, thrasymachus definition of justice republic, bk. Discussing socrates and thrasymachus views on justice. Polemarchus father cephalus wants to see socrates about something. Why socrates rejects glaucons version of the social contract. Most scholars agree that socrates arguments in the course of his refutation of thasymachus in platos republic are at best weak and at worse fallacious. No craft can have selfinterest at its end bc all crafts benefit patient, not practitioner. Polemarchus seems to accept socrates argument, but at this point, thrasymachus jumps into the conversation. The immediate context of the word informer seems to be, that thrasymachus suddenly realizes that socrates is interpreting him uncharitably.
Socrates begins by subjecting thrasymachus to a classic elenchusthat is, a refutation which elicits a contradiction from the interlocutors own assertions or admissions 339b340b. Socrates refutations of thrasymachus in republic i are unsatisfactory on a number of levels which need to be carefully distinguished. Socrates walks to the athens harbor, the piraeus, with glaucon, platos brother. Socrates begins his refutation of thrasymachus s position by eliciting thrasymachus s sincere conviction that the unjust person always tries to outdo pleonektein get the better of everyone in every situation. Socrates response is finally to shift the argument away from political and civil life to the issue of whether the life of the just or unjust man is stronger or better. After all, the despot is an individual, and his way of life is preferred by thrasymachus and is the ideal for all humans to aspire to.
According to nickolas pappas, platos republic routledge, 20, socrates unconvincing refutation of the view of the sophist thrasymachus. Dialectalessay2plato platos refutation of thrasymachus a. Thrasymachus on justicethrasymachus and the ruler in the strict sensesocrates refutation of thrasymachusconclusions. First, i show that there are three types of individuals associated with the thrasymachean view of society. The first book of platos republic is often treated as a standalone socratic dialogue in its own right. Thrasymachus is contained not so much in his criticism of justice understood as the advantage of the. Neither is capable of providing socrates with an adequate definition of justice.
In other words, socrates could have refuted thrasymachus in the same way he refuted alcibiades and polus, by appealing to their acceptance of the. Thrasymachus position, glaucon and adeimantus think, has not been sufficiently articulated. Some interpreters have used this logical inadequacy to argue that socrates aim is. Socrates regards justice as a concept designed to serve all. Essay, 5 pages in producing a counter argument to thrasymachus claim that justice is the advantage of the stronger, socrates bases his argument enourmously on sentimentality and prejudice. Differences between socrates and thrasymachuss views on. Litcharts assigns a color and icon to each theme in the republic, which you can use to track the themes throughout the work. The sophist thrasymachus 459400 bc was a renown teacher of rhetoric who created and perfected several rhetorical styles. In leo strauss s interpretation, thrasymachus and his definition of justice represent the city and its laws, and thus are in a sense opposed to socrates and to philosophy in general. Perhaps it can be argued that both socrates and thrasymachus. For example, in socrates view, a doctor does not seek his own advantage, but the. This admission followed directly by a problematic argument for the claim that justice is associated with cleverness, wisdom, and. Some interpreters have used this logical inadequacy to argue that socrates aim is psychotherapeutic rather than cognitive, but this does not address why thrasymachus feels shamed. His name means fierce fighter, which may have influenced his role in the dialogue.
487 1533 944 37 891 1638 228 1131 902 1239 921 64 751 1610 1179 985 1046 908 1601 1348 23 1657 572 1464 664 1605 634 1242 834 191 528 28 327 1022 154 1448